Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Piling On

I would like to take time today to describe an argument that the wife and I have had multiple times (and will likely continue to have since we both feel we are right).  I will do my best to be fair and present both sides of this dispute.  Here is a typical instance of this argument.


INT. DIETERMAN FAMILY ROOM – NIGHT
CHRIS and JON DIETERMAN are sitting on a couch watching a show on the TV.  The DIETERMAN CHILDREN have retired for the night.  JON gets up from the couch and heads toward the kitchen and proceeds to get himself something to drink.
CHRIS
(upon realizing that JON is getting a drink)
”Can you get me something too?”
JON
(leaving the kitchen with a single glass in his hand)
”Here, just have this glass that I have just poured.”
CHRIS
”I do not want to take yours.  Can you not pour 2 glasses and bring me 1?”
JON
”You wish to have a beverage.  You asked me for a beverage.  I am giving you a beverage.  You are getting exactly what you asked for!”
CHRIS
(frustrated)
”I want us both to have beverages.  Please pour another glass.”
END SCENE


The scene does not end here (ever!) but this gives you a decent overview of this argument.  Here is what is going through each of our minds (I am guessing for the most part what is going through the wife’s head).

JON’S HEAD

Most things that I do in life involve a calculation of the work/pain/effort to pleasure ratio.  I think all of this do this to some extent but I have managed to make this into an art.  A good example is last night.  We went out to dinner at our favorite pizza place (Brooklyn’s) and placed our usual order.  The lady behind the counter asked us what we wanted to drink.  Like most places, Brooklyn’s charges an incredible price for soft drinks compared to their cost.  Syrup, carbonated water, and the price of washing a cup still leaves space for 1000% profit.  I like soft drinks as much as the next guy but I do not think that it will bring me $2 worth of pleasure compared to the pain of being separated from my $2.  The real cost here is $6 since the wife and son would complain if I only bought a drink for myself (the daughter’s meal comes with a drink already) and $4 worth of pain is definitely worth the pleasure of not having to listen to them complain every time that I take a drink.  Since the pleasure I would get from the soft drink is less than the pain of spending $6, we all get water.  A few weeks ago while in the cafeteria at the office I spotted some donuts for $0.70 each.  They looked good and so I bought one.  I can tell you now that it did not bring me $0.70 worth of pleasure since is it was sort of bland so I will not be buying donuts from there again.  These examples both involve money but sometimes money is not involved.  This brings us back to the argument.  What the wife does not realize is that before I ever get up to get myself something to drink, I have done the math.  Specifically, I have calculated the amount of effort it will take to get up off the couch (I am confortable and cozy there), walk to the kitchen, get down a glass, get ice, pour the drink, return to the couch and (possibly) fight off a dog or two that has stolen my spot.  I have then compared that to the pleasure of drinking the beverage.  If pleasure > pain (in this case effort) then I get up and head to the kitchen.  If effort > pleasure then I do not.  Simple math.  When the wife asks me to get her something to drink then that throws off the equation.  I had not calculated the extra effort of pouring and carrying 2 glasses.  Also, at times there is only enough left for one glass (if we are almost out of sweet tea).  What do do then?  Do I give the wife the tea and I get by with water?  That would definitely throw off the math since now I have the pain side of the equation going up (more work) and the pleasure side going down (pleasure from drinking water < pleasure from drinking tea).  Also, now there is the effort of doing the math again.  In the end I am now doing 2 calculations.  First I have to determine if telling the wife “No, get your own.” is worth it.  Will the pleasure of my drink be greater than the sum of the effort to pour it and the pain of having her upset at me?  If I do give her the drink I have already poured (as in the scene above) then I need to calculate if pouring a glass of water (after already being up and in the kitchen) is worth the pleasure of drinking it.  In the end, I decide that it is NOT worth it to tell the wife to get her own drink and also that is is NOT worth it to pour myself an additional drink hence I do not get myself anything to drink.

CHRIS’ HEAD

The desire to have something to drink is something she would have been thinking about for several minutes before I got up to get myself something.  She too is doing her own calculation and the price of moving off the couch is more than the pleasure of having a drink.  This is understandable as in her equation she has the added warmth of at least one dog keeping her warm (likely Oreo on her lap) and the pain (removal of pleasure / warmth) if she got up.  I can respect her math here.  However, when I get up, she quickly recalculates.  Now the the pain side of the equation has been significantly reduced since she can “pile on” to the pain side of my equation and get the same amount of pleasure (or maybe slightly less depending on the relative value of having to deal with asking me to do this for her or perhaps dealing with an improper ice to liquid ratio due to my lack of beverage preparation skills).  At any rate, the pleasure to pain ratio for her has swung and she asks me (since I am already up) to pour her a drink as well.  When I do my recalculation and offer her my drink and then she notes that I will NOT be getting a drink, this lowers the pleasure side of her equation (or perhaps increases the pain, either way, it doesn’t matter).  The best solution (remember that we are in her head now) is for me to ignore my math and just do what she wants (keeping her equation clean and leaning toward pleasure).  She knows of course that I cannot do this (silly girl).

OUT OF OUR HEADS AND BACK TO THE BLOG

When she is forced to decide if the enjoyment of her drink is worth the pain of knowing that I have no beverage, we then have this argument where each of us describe basically what is going on in our heads.  We have two equations that cannot be solved.  The glass that I have already poured for myself is now not worth it.  The pain of having the wife upset with me is not worth the pleasure of drinking it and the wife’s pleasure of drinking it is not more than the pain of knowing that I have nothing.  This is the mathematical equivalent of dividing by 0 or calculating the value of the square root of –1.

In my defense, I am not upset at her asking me to get her a drink.  She is my wife, I do a lot of things for her.  What upsets me is the phenomenal lack of respect for math (math like she is doing in her head before asking me to do this chore).  Enjoy the drink.  I want you to have this drink.  It is ok.  Respect the math.
This argument has began to happen with the daughter as well (usually over a beverage though normally at the lunch or dinner table).  Her response is about like her mother’s.  The son, he just takes the drink and thanks me (he is good at math – but he is also not that great at empathizing with other’s feelings so that might be it).  Either way, I am almost certain that this blog is not the end of this discussion.

Jon

Saturday, November 12, 2011

The Listening Project-Week 16

Well another week has passed by and I was able to get through a few more CDs in my listening project.  Despite taking a 1/2 day vacation on Wednesday I was still able to get through 23 CDs this week but that still keeps me 2 CDs behind my 20 per week goal.  I lost ground this week though as I purchased nearly 30 CDs.  I picked up a large pile a the local 1/2 Priced Books store and hit a 75% - 90% sale at Mardel’s on Wednesday.  You can reference this blog entry for details about this project.  Here are the CDs I knocked off of my list this week.

# Artist Album Date Again?
296 John Mellencamp The Best That I Could Do 1978-1988 11/7/2011 Yes
297 The Wallflowers Breach 11/7/2011 Yes
298 Various Artists Classic Crooners Volume II 11/7/2011 Yes
299 Various Artists Classic Crooners Volume III 11/7/2011 Yes
300 Various Artists Common Thread - The Songs of the Eagles 11/7/2011 Yes
301 ZOEgirl Different Kind of Free 11/8/2011 Yes
302 Tears For Fears Elemental 11/8/2011 Yes
303 Norah Jones Feels Like Home 11/8/2011 Yes
304 Amy Grant Heart In Motion 11/9/2011 Yes
305 Mainstay Become Who You Are 11/9/2011 Yes
306 Red End of Silence 11/9/2011 Yes
307 Scott Wenzel Heart Like Thunder 11/10/2011 Yes
308 Twila Paris A Heart That Knows You 11/10/2011 Yes
309 Kutless Hearts of the Innocent 11/10/2011 Yes
310 Steven Curtis Chapman Heaven In The Real World 11/10/2011 Yes
311 Jaci Velasquez Heavenly Place 11/10/2011 Yes
312 John Mayer Heavier Things 11/10/2011 Yes
313 Various Artists Heck On Wheels 11/11/2011 Yes
314 Gretchen Wilson Here For The Party 11/11/2011 Yes
315 Skillet Hey You, I Love Your Soul 11/11/2011 Yes
316 Whitecross High Gear 11/11/2011 Yes
317 White Heart Highlands 11/11/2011 Yes
318 Garth Brooks The Hits 11/11/2011 Yes

Here are my thoughts on a few of these CDs that I have listened to over the past week…

  • John Mellencamp “The Best That I Could Do 1978-1988”: As I do each time I buy more CDs, I have to put them in alphabetical order and listen to those that begin with letters that I have already completed.  The first eight on this week’s list fit that category.  At my one experience at a karaoke bar (in Romania) I chose Small Town (on this CD) when I signed up to sing.  Despite being on the playlist, the DJ did not have this song.
  • The Wallflowers “Bleach”: If you don’t own any music by The Wallflowers, you should.
  • Various Artists “Classic Crooners Volume II” & “Classic Crooners Volume III”: A little brutal to listen to this much 50’s big band music all in a row, but good nonetheless.
  • Various Artists “Common Thread - The Songs of the Eagles”: Modern country artists singing the songs of the Eagles (which, let’s be honest here, sound kind of country when you listen to them now anyway).
  • Mainstay “Become Who You Are”: The label on this CD said that they toured with other bands I like.  At 90% off, that is enough of an incentive for me to purchase it.
  • Red “End Of Silence”: I got 2 CDs by Red this week.  The 2nd one will likely be in a blog entry a few weeks from now.  Pretty good band.
  • Scott Wenzel “Heart Like Thunder”: Scott is the lead singer of Whitecross and has a very unique voice.  This CD sounds more like a softer Whitecross album.
  • Twila Paris “A Heart That Knows You”: OK, I am scaring myself now.  Last week I gave a PFR CD a YES and now I give a YES to Twila Paris.  Something ain’t right here.
  • Kutless “Hearts of the Innocent”: Love Kutless!
  • John Mayer “Heavier Things”: I look hard for more John Mayer CDs every time I dig through the bargain racks.  So far this is the only one that I have found.
  • Various Artists “Heck on Wheels”: From what I can tell, this CD was meant to be played in retail stores as background music.  It has songs from groups like Ministry, The Flaming Lips, Faith No More, etc, but “clean” (no bad words).  I paid 50 cents for it as I recall.
  • Gretchen Wilson “Here For the Party”: “When it rains…I pour…another round…” – you have to love country music lyrics.
  • Skillet “Hey You, I Love Your Soul”: Skillet’s sound has changed a little over the years.  This is an early release.  I think I like their newer stuff better but this is still good.

A rare week with no NOs in the last column (though weeks 8 and 14 were that way as well).  I am still on pace to finish this project in June 2012.  A few more weeks like this though where I buy more than I listen to and that date will obviously change.  According to my calculations, I am at 35.7% complete now.

Jon

Saturday, November 5, 2011

The Listening Project-Week 15

Well another week has passed by and I was able to get through a few more CDs in my listening project.  Despite taking a 1/2 day vacation on Wednesday and not listening to any CDs on Thursday when I worked from the office, I was still able to get through 19 CDs this week but that still keeps me 5 CDs behind my 20 per week goal.  I managed to avoid buying any more CDs this week.  You can reference this blog entry for details about this project.  Here are the CDs I knocked off of my list this week.

# Artist Album Date Again?
277 C+C Music Factory Gonna Make You Sweat 10/31/2011 Yes
278 Various Artists Grease Soundtrack 10/31/2011 Yes
279 Steven Curtis Chapman The Great Adventure 10/31/2011 No
280 Rod Stewart The Great American Songbook Volume II 10/31/2011 Yes
281 Rod Stewart The Great American Songbook Volume IV 11/1/2011 Yes
282 Blindside The Great Depression 11/1/2011 Yes
283 Scott Stapp The Great Divide 11/1/2011 Yes
284 PFR Great Lengths 11/1/2011 Yes
285 Ministry Greatest Fits 11/1/2011 Yes
286 Queen Greatest Hits 11/2/2011 Yes
287 Michael Bolton Greatest Hits 1985-1995 11/2/2011 Yes
288 The Goo Goo Dolls Greatest Hits Volume One The Singles 11/4/2011 Yes
289 Mylon LeFevre & Broken Heart Greatest Hits 11/4/2011 Yes
290 Whitecross Hammer And Nail 11/4/2011 Yes
291 Spooky Tuesday Happy Dissonance 11/4/2011 No
292 Dead Artist Syndrome Happy Hour 11/4/2011 Yes
293 Hawk Nelson Hawk Nelson Is My Friend 11/4/2011 Yes
294 Michael W. Smith Healing Rain 11/4/2011 Yes
295 Queensrÿche Hear In The Now Frontier 11/4/2011 Yes

Here are my thoughts on a few of these CDs that I have listened to over the past week…

  • C+C Music Factory “Gonna Make You Sweat”: Everybody Dance Now!  Nuff said.
  • Various Artists “Grease Soundtrack”: My mom and dad had this on 8 track when I was young.  I think we wore it out when driving in our custom van.  I remember thinking it was poor planning to have the title song repeated as the last track as when you switched automatically from program 4 to program 1, the song repeated.  But hey, is there such a thing as too much Frankie Valli?
  • Steven Curtis Chapman “The Great Adventure”: Another NO for SCC.
  • Rod Stewart “The Great American Songbook Volume II” & “The Great American Songbook Volume IV”: I think I grabbed these off the bargain rack after Rod Stewart was on American Idol one year.  Good stuff really.
  • Blindside “The Great Depression”: I hope this band releases a new CD soon.
  • Scott Stapp “The Great Divide”: Scott is the (former) lead singer of Creed and this sounds about like other Creed albums.
  • PFR “Great Lengths”: I was surprised to give this a YES.  I thought all PFRs would fall in that other category.
  • Ministry “Greatest Fits”: The first of (5) “best of” CDs in a row.  Ministry started as a techno / new wave band but somewhere along the line transformed into industrial.  The drum machine used for this 2 piece band is obvious on some tracks.
  • Queen “Greatest Hits”: I am not sure if it is even legal to release a Queen best of CD and NOT include Bohemian Rhapsody but they did it anyway.  Fortunately it is on the sound track to Wayne’s World (which I also own).
  • Michael Bolton “Greatest Hits 1985-1995”: Don’t judge me!
  • Whitecross “Hammer And Nail”: Old school 80’s metal.  Ahhhhhhh.
  • Dead Artist Syndrome “Happy Hour”: I saw this group in concert at the Cornerstone 91 festival.  Cornerstone is this 3 or 4 day festival where you camp out and take in tons of artists.  As I recall, the folks camping across the way from us bootlegged the concert and the lead singer ended up coming over to listen to it.

I crossed over the 1/3 mark and am 34.1% of the way through,  At this rate it will be early June of 2012 when this project is completed.

Jon

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Same Problem Only Reversed

I have really enjoyed not wearing glasses.  As you may remember, about 2 years ago I had Lasik surgery done.  This allowed me to say goodbye to glasses which I have warn ever since I was a wee lad of 3 years.  Lately though I have had to resort to reading glasses when enjoying a book or reading directions.

I don’t mind this really.  I imagine that if I had not had the Lasik surgery then I would be looking at bifocals at this point in time anyway.  I even had fun picking out my reading glasses (sort of like picking out sunglasses).  I think that I like the idea that I can take them off when I am done needing them more than any other part of resorting to using them.  They really are only good for reading things up close though.

At the end of some work days when I have stared at the computer screen intensely for the better part of the day, my eyes are a bit tired.  I am using a 19” monitor that my work purchased for me 4 or 5 years ago so I am thinking it is about time for a new monitor.  I could probably go to my manager and make a case for a newer, bigger monitor but most folks that perform similar roles as I do seem to be satisfied with a monitor this size.  Also, I plan to return back into a routine of going into the office as soon as my Buick arrives down here in Texas in a few weeks.  Any monitor purchased by my work would be expected to remain in the office and that will leave me with no monitor to use when I work from home (although I am sure I would be able to keep this one for that purpose).  Either way, asking my work to provide me with a new monitor will only fix the problem part of the time.

I remember almost 15 years ago when I first had a job where I was assigned my own computer (and thus my own monitor).  I worked for a business that used CAD software to design items for manufacturing.  The company spent some serious money on the CAD software and also on big monitors.  I seem to recall the high end, 21” CRT monitors that the engineers were assigned ran about $2,500 each.  I was given a 19” monitor (which was huge to my eyes) and was very happy.  My manager however preferred to keep using a 17” monitor.  His logic behind this was that he did not want to have a bigger monitor at work than he could afford to purchase for home.  Evidently the cost of a 17” monitor was the price point he was willing to spend on his home computer and as such he used a much smaller screen than our company was willing to provide him.

At this point in my life I have the exact opposite problem.  I am sure that If I asked for a newer, bigger monitor that my manager would approve the purchase of it.  However, since monitors have come down in price so much in the last 15 years, I can afford a much bigger monitor than I could get approved for at work given my current role.

So, what size monitor should I get to use when I work from home?  I did a little research and the best answer I could find made me chuckle a little.  Basically given the relief of strain on your eyes that higher quality monitors provide and the relative cost of monitors nowadays the answer I liked best was, “How big of a monitor can your desk hold?”  So, I have been pricing really big monitors lately.  And by really big I mean 25” or 27”.  I regularly see 25” monitors for $200 and 27” monitors can be found for about $70 more but there is still the problem of having a smaller monitor when working at the office than when I work from home.  Decisions, decisions.

As I mentioned before, I will probably start working in the office more after the Buick arrives.  I guess I will wait and see what size of monitor I can convince my manager to get for me before I make any decisions.

Jon

Monday, October 31, 2011

A Simple NO Would Have Sufficed

The wife had to work (4) hours on Saturday and we are still surviving with only (1) car so I either could drive her to the pet store she was to be at or stay at home without a vehicle.  It turned out that I did not even have a choice as the son was invited to a birthday party at an hour between when the wife started and when she finished.  Since I would have the vehicle, it also fell on me to pick up birthday gifts.  I say "gifts" in the plural form as the birthday was for twin boys.  Since we just moved here and since we did not know the birthday boys that well, I (hesitantly) allowed myself to buy gift cards.


The wife was working 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM and the party started at 2:00 PM.  The pet store was a (30) minute drive and the party was at a place about (20) minutes from our house and (15) minutes from the pet store.  What all these details mean is that I had about (45) minutes to kill after I dropped off the son and before the wife would be ready (even accounting for drive time).  Since there was a Hobby Lobby near the pet store, the daughter (who was not invited to the party) and I decided to kill some time there.  Once the 3:00 hour approached we headed back to the pet store.


The wife was not quite finished so we hung out at the front of the store and made small talk with the pet store workers (all of which knew eerily too much about me having spent the last few hours with my wife).  We also talked with any customers, especially those who brought in their pets.  One of the last customers that checked out before the wife was ready to go was a man about my age with a large, hairy dog.  He was chatting nicely enough with the cashier, making light of the fact that his dog had grabbed a "snack" as they were going up and down the aisles that cost him $1.29.  As he was walking away from finishing paying the cashier and almost at the door, the cashier yelled out that the man had forgot his receipt.  She simply asked ,"Do you want your receipt?"  Now here a simple NO or YES would have sufficed (with a Thank You thrown in) but his reply was, "No, Obama would not let me claim it on my taxes anyway."  This reply was said with a hint of disgust (at Obama, not the cashier).  The cashier gave a nervous, "I have no idea what you mean but I am glad you are leaving" kind of smile and that was the end of that.


I had a few minutes to ponder the whole transaction before the wife was ready.  What was his point exactly with that answer?  Was he suggesting that previous presidents had allowed some sort of write off for pet toys and snacks and that Obama had come into office and immediately passed legislation that stopped this from being a possibility?  He just came off sounding like an idiot really.  I know that Texas is a red state and had voted McCain in 2008 and that the Dallas area is one of the only metroplexes that lean Republican but this guy was not doing any Texas Republicans any favor by flapping his jaw.  He could do those Texans who agree with him a favor by keeping his mouth shut.


Powered by Qumana


Saturday, October 29, 2011

The Listening Project-Week 14

Well another week has passed by and I was able to get through a few more CDs in my listening project.  Despite taking a 1/2 day vacation on Wednesday, I was still able to get through 21 CDs this week but that still keeps me a scarce 4 CDs behind my 20 per week goal.  I managed to avoid buying any more CDs this week.  You can reference this blog entry for details about this project.  Here are the CDs I knocked off of my list this week.

# Artist Album Date Again?
256 The W's Fourth From The Last 10/24/2011 Yes
257 White Heart Freedom 10/24/2011 Yes
258 Jon Anderson and Vangelis The Friends Of Mr. Cairo 10/24/2011 Yes
259 Matt Redman The Friendship And The Fear 10/24/2011 Yes
260 Charlie Peacock Full Circle 10/24/2011 Yes
261 Michael Roe Fun With Sound 10/24/2011 Yes
262 MC Hammer The Funky Headhunter 10/25/2011 Yes
263 Eleventyseven Galactic Conquest 10/25/2011 Yes
264 Cloud2Ground The Gate <Beautiful> 10/25/2011 Yes
265 Ray Charles Genius Loves Company 10/25/2011 Yes
266 Van Zant Get Right With The Man 10/25/2011 Yes
267 Jacobstone Glass Top Ships 10/25/2011 Yes
268 Various Artists Glee - The Music, Season One, Volume 1 10/26/2011 Yes
269 Various Artists Glee - The Music, Volume 3 Showstoppers 10/26/2011 Yes
270 Sheryl Crow Globe Session 10/27/2011 Yes
271 Delirious? Glo 10/27/2011 Yes
272 Rick Altizer Go Nova 10/27/2011 Yes
273 Michael W. Smith Go West Young Man 10/28/2011 Yes
274 Crash Test Dummies God Shuffled His Feet 10/28/2011 Yes
275 Rebecca St. James God 10/28/2011 Yes
276 The 77s A Golden Field of Radioactive Crows 10/28/2011 Yes

Here are my thoughts on a few of these CDs that I have listened to over the past week…

  • The W’s “Fourth From The Last": I think I want to be a fan of ska music but I cannot quite convince my ears.  I first heard this band during the Veggie Tales “The Rumor Weed” soundtrack so when I saw them on the bargain rack I had to buy this CD.
  • Jon Anderson and Vangelis “The Friends of Mr. Cairo”: Jon Anderson (former leas singer of Yes) and Vangelis (Chariots of Fire) together on one CD on the clearance rack was too interesting to pass up.  I love Jon’s voice.
  • Charlie Peacock “Full Circle”:  Think of this as a tribute album only with the artists inviting Charlie along for the ride.  He sings on every song and also has 2 new songs to boot!  An interesting CD.
  • Michael Roe “Fun With Sound”: Michael releases about as many solo CDs as he does with his band (The 77s).  There is only a subtle difference and non fans probably could not tell the difference between his solo stuff and his band stuff.
  • MC Hammer “The Funky Headhunter”: Yes, I own an MC Hammer CD.  Don’t judge me!
  • Eleventyseven “Galactic Conquest”: This contains a favorite song of mine (“Happiness”) - Happiness is overrated | It always lets me down  | It's artificially inflated | She's a flirt and she burns me every time | Happiness is just a dream and nothing's what it seems,  I won’t go into why this song is one of my favorites in this blog.
  • Ray Charles “Genius Loves Company”: I seriously considered buying this at full price when I saw it originally at a Starbucks.  Fortunately I waited and got it for $1 later.  Some other poor sap paid full price.
  • (Reminder: Insert some logical reason why I own 2 Glee CDs)
  • Crash Test Dummies “God Shuffled His Feet”: This band is so unlike any other band that I know.  The deep voice, the oddball choice of lyrical subject matter (from the singer’s asthma to his wondering how ducks tell which other duck is their wife).  A good listen anytime.

I am almost 1/3 of the way done (31.9%) and with any luck (and resolve on my part NOT to buy any more CDs when I am out shopping today) I should hit the 1/3 mark next week.

Jon

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Joining the No Hang List

Last week I told you about my efforts to join the No Throw List.  I can tell you that Saturday came and went and neither my driveway (nor my front yard) contained a copy of the McKinney Courier Gazette.  I had my doubts that the No Throw List really existed or that it would work.  Time will tell if the thrower of these newspapers remembers our address or not.

Later in the week I opened my front door to find another unwanted item.  This time it was connected to my door handle with a rubber band and was a tall, skinny piece of colored advertising.  It was about 20” x 6” and contained advertising on both sides.  The businesses that were listed were as follows.

  • Palio’s Pizza Café
  • Pop-Ins Maid Service
  • Auto Spa & Detail
  • Roosters Men’s Grooming Center
  • Urban Extreme Nutrition
  • Pro Star Painting
  • Total Tan
  • McKinney Pain & Wellness Center
  • Smith Monitoring
  • Keller Williams Realtors
  • Floor Hut
  • Direct Appliance Service & Parts
  • McKinney Martial Arts
  • Saverful Door Hanger Advertising

I looked over all the ads and any coupons that were mentioned and did not see anything useful to me (though I could probably use the Total Tan product).  The last one on the above list seemed to be the originator of this unwanted and unasked for paper being placed on my property so I found their website and found an email address on the Contact Us section.  I sent an email that basically asked if there was a way that I not be included in future door hangings.

Much to my surprise I received a reply 15 minutes later noting their sorrow that I did not find their “product” (quotes added by me) useful and that if I was worried about WHO was coming to my door that they did background checks on the the people that distribute their door hangers.  They then asked that I provide my address as “We definitely do not want to distribute to any houses that do not want or appreciate our service.”

I did not care for the tone of the email (indicating that it was I who was strange for not appreciating this service) but I simply replied with my home address and a short note of thanks for the quick reply.

I am not sure why this type of thing bothers me.  But, who are they to have permission to come onto my property and affix things to my house?  Or, in the case of the newspaper, to throw things onto my property?  We are bombarded with so much advertising that I think there should be a line drawn somewhere.  I guess these 2 efforts are my own little line.  All I know is that 2 advertising groups have my specific home address now and I am not so sure that is a good thing.

Jon